Uploaded Test files

venv/Lib/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/_helpers.py

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+def bug(issue=None):
+    message = "A known bug."
+    if issue is not None:
+        message += " See issue #{issue}.".format(issue=issue)
+    return message

venv/Lib/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/_suite.py

@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+"""
+Python representations of the JSON Schema Test Suite tests.
+"""
+
+from functools import partial
+import json
+import os
+import re
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import unittest
+
+from twisted.python.filepath import FilePath
+import attr
+
+from jsonschema.compat import PY3
+from jsonschema.validators import validators
+import jsonschema
+
+
+def _find_suite():
+    root = os.environ.get("JSON_SCHEMA_TEST_SUITE")
+    if root is not None:
+        return FilePath(root)
+
+    root = FilePath(jsonschema.__file__).parent().sibling("json")
+    if not root.isdir():  # pragma: no cover
+        raise ValueError(
+            (
+                "Can't find the JSON-Schema-Test-Suite directory. "
+                "Set the 'JSON_SCHEMA_TEST_SUITE' environment "
+                "variable or run the tests from alongside a checkout "
+                "of the suite."
+            ),
+        )
+    return root
+
+
+@attr.s(hash=True)
+class Suite(object):
+
+    _root = attr.ib(default=attr.Factory(_find_suite))
+
+    def _remotes(self):
+        jsonschema_suite = self._root.descendant(["bin", "jsonschema_suite"])
+        remotes = subprocess.check_output(
+            [sys.executable, jsonschema_suite.path, "remotes"],
+        )
+        return {
+            "http://localhost:1234/" + name: schema
+            for name, schema in json.loads(remotes.decode("utf-8")).items()
+        }
+
+    def benchmark(self, runner):  # pragma: no cover
+        for name in validators:
+            self.version(name=name).benchmark(runner=runner)
+
+    def version(self, name):
+        return Version(
+            name=name,
+            path=self._root.descendant(["tests", name]),
+            remotes=self._remotes(),
+        )
+
+
+@attr.s(hash=True)
+class Version(object):
+
+    _path = attr.ib()
+    _remotes = attr.ib()
+
+    name = attr.ib()
+
+    def benchmark(self, runner, **kwargs):  # pragma: no cover
+        for suite in self.tests():
+            for test in suite:
+                runner.bench_func(
+                    test.fully_qualified_name,
+                    partial(test.validate_ignoring_errors, **kwargs),
+                )
+
+    def tests(self):
+        return (
+            test
+            for child in self._path.globChildren("*.json")
+            for test in self._tests_in(
+                subject=child.basename()[:-5],
+                path=child,
+            )
+        )
+
+    def format_tests(self):
+        path = self._path.descendant(["optional", "format"])
+        return (
+            test
+            for child in path.globChildren("*.json")
+            for test in self._tests_in(
+                subject=child.basename()[:-5],
+                path=child,
+            )
+        )
+
+    def tests_of(self, name):
+        return self._tests_in(
+            subject=name,
+            path=self._path.child(name + ".json"),
+        )
+
+    def optional_tests_of(self, name):
+        return self._tests_in(
+            subject=name,
+            path=self._path.descendant(["optional", name + ".json"]),
+        )
+
+    def to_unittest_testcase(self, *suites, **kwargs):
+        name = kwargs.pop("name", "Test" + self.name.title())
+        methods = {
+            test.method_name: test.to_unittest_method(**kwargs)
+            for suite in suites
+            for tests in suite
+            for test in tests
+        }
+        cls = type(name, (unittest.TestCase,), methods)
+
+        try:
+            cls.__module__ = _someone_save_us_the_module_of_the_caller()
+        except Exception:  # pragma: no cover
+            # We're doing crazy things, so if they go wrong, like a function
+            # behaving differently on some other interpreter, just make them
+            # not happen.
+            pass
+
+        return cls
+
+    def _tests_in(self, subject, path):
+        for each in json.loads(path.getContent().decode("utf-8")):
+            yield (
+                _Test(
+                    version=self,
+                    subject=subject,
+                    case_description=each["description"],
+                    schema=each["schema"],
+                    remotes=self._remotes,
+                    **test
+                ) for test in each["tests"]
+            )
+
+
+@attr.s(hash=True, repr=False)
+class _Test(object):
+
+    version = attr.ib()
+
+    subject = attr.ib()
+    case_description = attr.ib()
+    description = attr.ib()
+
+    data = attr.ib()
+    schema = attr.ib(repr=False)
+
+    valid = attr.ib()
+
+    _remotes = attr.ib()
+
+    def __repr__(self):  # pragma: no cover
+        return "<Test {}>".format(self.fully_qualified_name)
+
+    @property
+    def fully_qualified_name(self):  # pragma: no cover
+        return " > ".join(
+            [
+                self.version.name,
+                self.subject,
+                self.case_description,
+                self.description,
+            ]
+        )
+
+    @property
+    def method_name(self):
+        delimiters = r"[\W\- ]+"
+        name = "test_%s_%s_%s" % (
+            re.sub(delimiters, "_", self.subject),
+            re.sub(delimiters, "_", self.case_description),
+            re.sub(delimiters, "_", self.description),
+        )
+
+        if not PY3:  # pragma: no cover
+            name = name.encode("utf-8")
+        return name
+
+    def to_unittest_method(self, skip=lambda test: None, **kwargs):
+        if self.valid:
+            def fn(this):
+                self.validate(**kwargs)
+        else:
+            def fn(this):
+                with this.assertRaises(jsonschema.ValidationError):
+                    self.validate(**kwargs)
+
+        fn.__name__ = self.method_name
+        reason = skip(self)
+        return unittest.skipIf(reason is not None, reason)(fn)
+
+    def validate(self, Validator, **kwargs):
+        resolver = jsonschema.RefResolver.from_schema(
+            schema=self.schema,
+            store=self._remotes,
+            id_of=Validator.ID_OF,
+        )
+        jsonschema.validate(
+            instance=self.data,
+            schema=self.schema,
+            cls=Validator,
+            resolver=resolver,
+            **kwargs
+        )
+
+    def validate_ignoring_errors(self, Validator):  # pragma: no cover
+        try:
+            self.validate(Validator=Validator)
+        except jsonschema.ValidationError:
+            pass
+
+
+def _someone_save_us_the_module_of_the_caller():
+    """
+    The FQON of the module 2nd stack frames up from here.
+
+    This is intended to allow us to dynamicallly return test case classes that
+    are indistinguishable from being defined in the module that wants them.
+
+    Otherwise, trial will mis-print the FQON, and copy pasting it won't re-run
+    the class that really is running.
+
+    Save us all, this is all so so so so so terrible.
+    """
+
+    return sys._getframe(2).f_globals["__name__"]

venv/Lib/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_cli.py

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+from unittest import TestCase
+import json
+import subprocess
+import sys
+
+from jsonschema import Draft4Validator, ValidationError, cli, __version__
+from jsonschema.compat import NativeIO
+from jsonschema.exceptions import SchemaError
+
+
+def fake_validator(*errors):
+    errors = list(reversed(errors))
+
+    class FakeValidator(object):
+        def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+            pass
+
+        def iter_errors(self, instance):
+            if errors:
+                return errors.pop()
+            return []
+
+        def check_schema(self, schema):
+            pass
+
+    return FakeValidator
+
+
+class TestParser(TestCase):
+
+    FakeValidator = fake_validator()
+    instance_file = "foo.json"
+    schema_file = "schema.json"
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        cli.open = self.fake_open
+        self.addCleanup(delattr, cli, "open")
+
+    def fake_open(self, path):
+        if path == self.instance_file:
+            contents = ""
+        elif path == self.schema_file:
+            contents = {}
+        else:  # pragma: no cover
+            self.fail("What is {!r}".format(path))
+        return NativeIO(json.dumps(contents))
+
+    def test_find_validator_by_fully_qualified_object_name(self):
+        arguments = cli.parse_args(
+            [
+                "--validator",
+                "jsonschema.tests.test_cli.TestParser.FakeValidator",
+                "--instance", self.instance_file,
+                self.schema_file,
+            ]
+        )
+        self.assertIs(arguments["validator"], self.FakeValidator)
+
+    def test_find_validator_in_jsonschema(self):
+        arguments = cli.parse_args(
+            [
+                "--validator", "Draft4Validator",
+                "--instance", self.instance_file,
+                self.schema_file,
+            ]
+        )
+        self.assertIs(arguments["validator"], Draft4Validator)
+
+
+class TestCLI(TestCase):
+    def test_draft3_schema_draft4_validator(self):
+        stdout, stderr = NativeIO(), NativeIO()
+        with self.assertRaises(SchemaError):
+            cli.run(
+                {
+                    "validator": Draft4Validator,
+                    "schema": {
+                        "anyOf": [
+                            {"minimum": 20},
+                            {"type": "string"},
+                            {"required": True},
+                        ],
+                    },
+                    "instances": [1],
+                    "error_format": "{error.message}",
+                },
+                stdout=stdout,
+                stderr=stderr,
+            )
+
+    def test_successful_validation(self):
+        stdout, stderr = NativeIO(), NativeIO()
+        exit_code = cli.run(
+            {
+                "validator": fake_validator(),
+                "schema": {},
+                "instances": [1],
+                "error_format": "{error.message}",
+            },
+            stdout=stdout,
+            stderr=stderr,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout.getvalue())
+        self.assertFalse(stderr.getvalue())
+        self.assertEqual(exit_code, 0)
+
+    def test_unsuccessful_validation(self):
+        error = ValidationError("I am an error!", instance=1)
+        stdout, stderr = NativeIO(), NativeIO()
+        exit_code = cli.run(
+            {
+                "validator": fake_validator([error]),
+                "schema": {},
+                "instances": [1],
+                "error_format": "{error.instance} - {error.message}",
+            },
+            stdout=stdout,
+            stderr=stderr,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout.getvalue())
+        self.assertEqual(stderr.getvalue(), "1 - I am an error!")
+        self.assertEqual(exit_code, 1)
+
+    def test_unsuccessful_validation_multiple_instances(self):
+        first_errors = [
+            ValidationError("9", instance=1),
+            ValidationError("8", instance=1),
+        ]
+        second_errors = [ValidationError("7", instance=2)]
+        stdout, stderr = NativeIO(), NativeIO()
+        exit_code = cli.run(
+            {
+                "validator": fake_validator(first_errors, second_errors),
+                "schema": {},
+                "instances": [1, 2],
+                "error_format": "{error.instance} - {error.message}\t",
+            },
+            stdout=stdout,
+            stderr=stderr,
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(stdout.getvalue())
+        self.assertEqual(stderr.getvalue(), "1 - 9\t1 - 8\t2 - 7\t")
+        self.assertEqual(exit_code, 1)
+
+    def test_version(self):
+        version = subprocess.check_output(
+            [sys.executable, "-m", "jsonschema", "--version"],
+            stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
+        )
+        version = version.decode("utf-8").strip()
+        self.assertEqual(version, __version__)

venv/Lib/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_exceptions.py

@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+from unittest import TestCase
+import textwrap
+
+from jsonschema import Draft4Validator, exceptions
+from jsonschema.compat import PY3
+
+
+class TestBestMatch(TestCase):
+    def best_match(self, errors):
+        errors = list(errors)
+        best = exceptions.best_match(errors)
+        reversed_best = exceptions.best_match(reversed(errors))
+        msg = "Didn't return a consistent best match!\nGot: {0}\n\nThen: {1}"
+        self.assertEqual(
+            best._contents(), reversed_best._contents(),
+            msg=msg.format(best, reversed_best),
+        )
+        return best
+
+    def test_shallower_errors_are_better_matches(self):
+        validator = Draft4Validator(
+            {
+                "properties": {
+                    "foo": {
+                        "minProperties": 2,
+                        "properties": {"bar": {"type": "object"}},
+                    },
+                },
+            },
+        )
+        best = self.best_match(validator.iter_errors({"foo": {"bar": []}}))
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minProperties")
+
+    def test_oneOf_and_anyOf_are_weak_matches(self):
+        """
+        A property you *must* match is probably better than one you have to
+        match a part of.
+        """
+
+        validator = Draft4Validator(
+            {
+                "minProperties": 2,
+                "anyOf": [{"type": "string"}, {"type": "number"}],
+                "oneOf": [{"type": "string"}, {"type": "number"}],
+            }
+        )
+        best = self.best_match(validator.iter_errors({}))
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator, "minProperties")
+
+    def test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_anyOf_it_is_traversed(self):
+        """
+        If the most relevant error is an anyOf, then we traverse its context
+        and select the otherwise *least* relevant error, since in this case
+        that means the most specific, deep, error inside the instance.
+
+        I.e. since only one of the schemas must match, we look for the most
+        relevant one.
+        """
+
+        validator = Draft4Validator(
+            {
+                "properties": {
+                    "foo": {
+                        "anyOf": [
+                            {"type": "string"},
+                            {"properties": {"bar": {"type": "array"}}},
+                        ],
+                    },
+                },
+            },
+        )
+        best = self.best_match(validator.iter_errors({"foo": {"bar": 12}}))
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "array")
+
+    def test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_oneOf_it_is_traversed(self):
+        """
+        If the most relevant error is an oneOf, then we traverse its context
+        and select the otherwise *least* relevant error, since in this case
+        that means the most specific, deep, error inside the instance.
+
+        I.e. since only one of the schemas must match, we look for the most
+        relevant one.
+        """
+
+        validator = Draft4Validator(
+            {
+                "properties": {
+                    "foo": {
+                        "oneOf": [
+                            {"type": "string"},
+                            {"properties": {"bar": {"type": "array"}}},
+                        ],
+                    },
+                },
+            },
+        )
+        best = self.best_match(validator.iter_errors({"foo": {"bar": 12}}))
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "array")
+
+    def test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_allOf_it_is_traversed(self):
+        """
+        Now, if the error is allOf, we traverse but select the *most* relevant
+        error from the context, because all schemas here must match anyways.
+        """
+
+        validator = Draft4Validator(
+            {
+                "properties": {
+                    "foo": {
+                        "allOf": [
+                            {"type": "string"},
+                            {"properties": {"bar": {"type": "array"}}},
+                        ],
+                    },
+                },
+            },
+        )
+        best = self.best_match(validator.iter_errors({"foo": {"bar": 12}}))
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "string")
+
+    def test_nested_context_for_oneOf(self):
+        validator = Draft4Validator(
+            {
+                "properties": {
+                    "foo": {
+                        "oneOf": [
+                            {"type": "string"},
+                            {
+                                "oneOf": [
+                                    {"type": "string"},
+                                    {
+                                        "properties": {
+                                            "bar": {"type": "array"},
+                                        },
+                                    },
+                                ],
+                            },
+                        ],
+                    },
+                },
+            },
+        )
+        best = self.best_match(validator.iter_errors({"foo": {"bar": 12}}))
+        self.assertEqual(best.validator_value, "array")
+
+    def test_one_error(self):
+        validator = Draft4Validator({"minProperties": 2})
+        error, = validator.iter_errors({})
+        self.assertEqual(
+            exceptions.best_match(validator.iter_errors({})).validator,
+            "minProperties",
+        )
+
+    def test_no_errors(self):
+        validator = Draft4Validator({})
+        self.assertIsNone(exceptions.best_match(validator.iter_errors({})))
+
+
+class TestByRelevance(TestCase):
+    def test_short_paths_are_better_matches(self):
+        shallow = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=["baz"])
+        deep = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=["foo", "bar"])
+        match = max([shallow, deep], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertIs(match, shallow)
+
+        match = max([deep, shallow], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertIs(match, shallow)
+
+    def test_global_errors_are_even_better_matches(self):
+        shallow = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=[])
+        deep = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=["foo"])
+
+        errors = sorted([shallow, deep], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            [list(error.path) for error in errors],
+            [["foo"], []],
+        )
+
+        errors = sorted([deep, shallow], key=exceptions.relevance)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            [list(error.path) for error in errors],
+            [["foo"], []],
+        )
+
+    def test_weak_validators_are_lower_priority(self):
+        weak = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=[], validator="a")
+        normal = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=[], validator="b")
+
+        best_match = exceptions.by_relevance(weak="a")
+
+        match = max([weak, normal], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, normal)
+
+        match = max([normal, weak], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, normal)
+
+    def test_strong_validators_are_higher_priority(self):
+        weak = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh no!", path=[], validator="a")
+        normal = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh yes!", path=[], validator="b")
+        strong = exceptions.ValidationError("Oh fine!", path=[], validator="c")
+
+        best_match = exceptions.by_relevance(weak="a", strong="c")
+
+        match = max([weak, normal, strong], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, strong)
+
+        match = max([strong, normal, weak], key=best_match)
+        self.assertIs(match, strong)
+
+
+class TestErrorTree(TestCase):
+    def test_it_knows_how_many_total_errors_it_contains(self):
+        # FIXME: https://github.com/Julian/jsonschema/issues/442
+        errors = [
+            exceptions.ValidationError("Something", validator=i)
+            for i in range(8)
+        ]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertEqual(tree.total_errors, 8)
+
+    def test_it_contains_an_item_if_the_item_had_an_error(self):
+        errors = [exceptions.ValidationError("a message", path=["bar"])]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertIn("bar", tree)
+
+    def test_it_does_not_contain_an_item_if_the_item_had_no_error(self):
+        errors = [exceptions.ValidationError("a message", path=["bar"])]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertNotIn("foo", tree)
+
+    def test_validators_that_failed_appear_in_errors_dict(self):
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError("a message", validator="foo")
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([error])
+        self.assertEqual(tree.errors, {"foo": error})
+
+    def test_it_creates_a_child_tree_for_each_nested_path(self):
+        errors = [
+            exceptions.ValidationError("a bar message", path=["bar"]),
+            exceptions.ValidationError("a bar -> 0 message", path=["bar", 0]),
+        ]
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree(errors)
+        self.assertIn(0, tree["bar"])
+        self.assertNotIn(1, tree["bar"])
+
+    def test_children_have_their_errors_dicts_built(self):
+        e1, e2 = (
+            exceptions.ValidationError("1", validator="foo", path=["bar", 0]),
+            exceptions.ValidationError("2", validator="quux", path=["bar", 0]),
+        )
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([e1, e2])
+        self.assertEqual(tree["bar"][0].errors, {"foo": e1, "quux": e2})
+
+    def test_multiple_errors_with_instance(self):
+        e1, e2 = (
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "1",
+                validator="foo",
+                path=["bar", "bar2"],
+                instance="i1"),
+            exceptions.ValidationError(
+                "2",
+                validator="quux",
+                path=["foobar", 2],
+                instance="i2"),
+        )
+        exceptions.ErrorTree([e1, e2])
+
+    def test_it_does_not_contain_subtrees_that_are_not_in_the_instance(self):
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError("123", validator="foo", instance=[])
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([error])
+
+        with self.assertRaises(IndexError):
+            tree[0]
+
+    def test_if_its_in_the_tree_anyhow_it_does_not_raise_an_error(self):
+        """
+        If a validator is dumb (like :validator:`required` in draft 3) and
+        refers to a path that isn't in the instance, the tree still properly
+        returns a subtree for that path.
+        """
+
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError(
+            "a message", validator="foo", instance={}, path=["foo"],
+        )
+        tree = exceptions.ErrorTree([error])
+        self.assertIsInstance(tree["foo"], exceptions.ErrorTree)
+
+
+class TestErrorInitReprStr(TestCase):
+    def make_error(self, **kwargs):
+        defaults = dict(
+            message=u"hello",
+            validator=u"type",
+            validator_value=u"string",
+            instance=5,
+            schema={u"type": u"string"},
+        )
+        defaults.update(kwargs)
+        return exceptions.ValidationError(**defaults)
+
+    def assertShows(self, expected, **kwargs):
+        if PY3:  # pragma: no cover
+            expected = expected.replace("u'", "'")
+        expected = textwrap.dedent(expected).rstrip("\n")
+
+        error = self.make_error(**kwargs)
+        message_line, _, rest = str(error).partition("\n")
+        self.assertEqual(message_line, error.message)
+        self.assertEqual(rest, expected)
+
+    def test_it_calls_super_and_sets_args(self):
+        error = self.make_error()
+        self.assertGreater(len(error.args), 1)
+
+    def test_repr(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            repr(exceptions.ValidationError(message="Hello!")),
+            "<ValidationError: %r>" % "Hello!",
+        )
+
+    def test_unset_error(self):
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError("message")
+        self.assertEqual(str(error), "message")
+
+        kwargs = {
+            "validator": "type",
+            "validator_value": "string",
+            "instance": 5,
+            "schema": {"type": "string"},
+        }
+        # Just the message should show if any of the attributes are unset
+        for attr in kwargs:
+            k = dict(kwargs)
+            del k[attr]
+            error = exceptions.ValidationError("message", **k)
+            self.assertEqual(str(error), "message")
+
+    def test_empty_paths(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating u'type' in schema:
+                {u'type': u'string'}
+
+            On instance:
+                5
+            """,
+            path=[],
+            schema_path=[],
+        )
+
+    def test_one_item_paths(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating u'type' in schema:
+                {u'type': u'string'}
+
+            On instance[0]:
+                5
+            """,
+            path=[0],
+            schema_path=["items"],
+        )
+
+    def test_multiple_item_paths(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating u'type' in schema[u'items'][0]:
+                {u'type': u'string'}
+
+            On instance[0][u'a']:
+                5
+            """,
+            path=[0, u"a"],
+            schema_path=[u"items", 0, 1],
+        )
+
+    def test_uses_pprint(self):
+        self.assertShows(
+            """
+            Failed validating u'maxLength' in schema:
+                {0: 0,
+                 1: 1,
+                 2: 2,
+                 3: 3,
+                 4: 4,
+                 5: 5,
+                 6: 6,
+                 7: 7,
+                 8: 8,
+                 9: 9,
+                 10: 10,
+                 11: 11,
+                 12: 12,
+                 13: 13,
+                 14: 14,
+                 15: 15,
+                 16: 16,
+                 17: 17,
+                 18: 18,
+                 19: 19}
+
+            On instance:
+                [0,
+                 1,
+                 2,
+                 3,
+                 4,
+                 5,
+                 6,
+                 7,
+                 8,
+                 9,
+                 10,
+                 11,
+                 12,
+                 13,
+                 14,
+                 15,
+                 16,
+                 17,
+                 18,
+                 19,
+                 20,
+                 21,
+                 22,
+                 23,
+                 24]
+            """,
+            instance=list(range(25)),
+            schema=dict(zip(range(20), range(20))),
+            validator=u"maxLength",
+        )
+
+    def test_str_works_with_instances_having_overriden_eq_operator(self):
+        """
+        Check for https://github.com/Julian/jsonschema/issues/164 which
+        rendered exceptions unusable when a `ValidationError` involved
+        instances with an `__eq__` method that returned truthy values.
+        """
+
+        class DontEQMeBro(object):
+            def __eq__(this, other):  # pragma: no cover
+                self.fail("Don't!")
+
+            def __ne__(this, other):  # pragma: no cover
+                self.fail("Don't!")
+
+        instance = DontEQMeBro()
+        error = exceptions.ValidationError(
+            "a message",
+            validator="foo",
+            instance=instance,
+            validator_value="some",
+            schema="schema",
+        )
+        self.assertIn(repr(instance), str(error))
+
+
+class TestHashable(TestCase):
+    def test_hashable(self):
+        set([exceptions.ValidationError("")])
+        set([exceptions.SchemaError("")])

venv/Lib/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_format.py

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+"""
+Tests for the parts of jsonschema related to the :validator:`format` property.
+"""
+
+from unittest import TestCase
+
+from jsonschema import FormatError, ValidationError, FormatChecker
+from jsonschema.validators import Draft4Validator
+
+
+BOOM = ValueError("Boom!")
+BANG = ZeroDivisionError("Bang!")
+
+
+def boom(thing):
+    if thing == "bang":
+        raise BANG
+    raise BOOM
+
+
+class TestFormatChecker(TestCase):
+    def test_it_can_validate_no_formats(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker(formats=())
+        self.assertFalse(checker.checkers)
+
+    def test_it_raises_a_key_error_for_unknown_formats(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(KeyError):
+            FormatChecker(formats=["o noes"])
+
+    def test_it_can_register_cls_checkers(self):
+        original = dict(FormatChecker.checkers)
+        self.addCleanup(FormatChecker.checkers.pop, "boom")
+        FormatChecker.cls_checks("boom")(boom)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            FormatChecker.checkers,
+            dict(original, boom=(boom, ())),
+        )
+
+    def test_it_can_register_checkers(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        checker.checks("boom")(boom)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            checker.checkers,
+            dict(FormatChecker.checkers, boom=(boom, ()))
+        )
+
+    def test_it_catches_registered_errors(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        checker.checks("boom", raises=type(BOOM))(boom)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(FormatError) as cm:
+            checker.check(instance=12, format="boom")
+
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.cause, BOOM)
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.__cause__, BOOM)
+
+        # Unregistered errors should not be caught
+        with self.assertRaises(type(BANG)):
+            checker.check(instance="bang", format="boom")
+
+    def test_format_error_causes_become_validation_error_causes(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        checker.checks("boom", raises=ValueError)(boom)
+        validator = Draft4Validator({"format": "boom"}, format_checker=checker)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError) as cm:
+            validator.validate("BOOM")
+
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.cause, BOOM)
+        self.assertIs(cm.exception.__cause__, BOOM)
+
+    def test_format_checkers_come_with_defaults(self):
+        # This is bad :/ but relied upon.
+        # The docs for quite awhile recommended people do things like
+        # validate(..., format_checker=FormatChecker())
+        # We should change that, but we can't without deprecation...
+        checker = FormatChecker()
+        with self.assertRaises(FormatError):
+            checker.check(instance="not-an-ipv4", format="ipv4")
+
+    def test_repr(self):
+        checker = FormatChecker(formats=())
+        checker.checks("foo")(lambda thing: True)
+        checker.checks("bar")(lambda thing: True)
+        checker.checks("baz")(lambda thing: True)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            repr(checker),
+            "<FormatChecker checkers=['bar', 'baz', 'foo']>",
+        )

venv/Lib/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_jsonschema_test_suite.py

@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+"""
+Test runner for the JSON Schema official test suite
+
+Tests comprehensive correctness of each draft's validator.
+
+See https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite for details.
+"""
+
+import sys
+import warnings
+
+from jsonschema import (
+    Draft3Validator,
+    Draft4Validator,
+    Draft6Validator,
+    Draft7Validator,
+    draft3_format_checker,
+    draft4_format_checker,
+    draft6_format_checker,
+    draft7_format_checker,
+)
+from jsonschema.tests._helpers import bug
+from jsonschema.tests._suite import Suite
+from jsonschema.validators import _DEPRECATED_DEFAULT_TYPES, create
+
+
+SUITE = Suite()
+DRAFT3 = SUITE.version(name="draft3")
+DRAFT4 = SUITE.version(name="draft4")
+DRAFT6 = SUITE.version(name="draft6")
+DRAFT7 = SUITE.version(name="draft7")
+
+
+def skip(message, **kwargs):
+    def skipper(test):
+        if all(value == getattr(test, attr) for attr, value in kwargs.items()):
+            return message
+    return skipper
+
+
+def missing_format(checker):
+    def missing_format(test):
+        schema = test.schema
+        if schema is True or schema is False or "format" not in schema:
+            return
+
+        if schema["format"] not in checker.checkers:
+            return "Format checker {0!r} not found.".format(schema["format"])
+    return missing_format
+
+
+is_narrow_build = sys.maxunicode == 2 ** 16 - 1
+if is_narrow_build:  # pragma: no cover
+    message = "Not running surrogate Unicode case, this Python is narrow."
+
+    def narrow_unicode_build(test):  # pragma: no cover
+        return skip(
+            message=message,
+            description="one supplementary Unicode code point is not long enough",
+        )(test) or skip(
+            message=message,
+            description="two supplementary Unicode code points is long enough",
+        )(test)
+else:
+    def narrow_unicode_build(test):  # pragma: no cover
+        return
+
+
+TestDraft3 = DRAFT3.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT3.tests(),
+    DRAFT3.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT3.optional_tests_of(name="format"),
+    DRAFT3.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
+    Validator=Draft3Validator,
+    format_checker=draft3_format_checker,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        narrow_unicode_build(test)
+        or missing_format(draft3_format_checker)(test)
+        or skip(
+            message="Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
+            subject="format",
+            description="case-insensitive T and Z",
+        )(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft4 = DRAFT4.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT4.tests(),
+    DRAFT4.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT4.optional_tests_of(name="format"),
+    DRAFT4.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
+    Validator=Draft4Validator,
+    format_checker=draft4_format_checker,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        narrow_unicode_build(test)
+        or missing_format(draft4_format_checker)(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description="Recursive references between schemas",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description="Location-independent identifier",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description=(
+                "Location-independent identifier with absolute URI"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description=(
+                "Location-independent identifier with base URI change in subschema"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(),
+            subject="refRemote",
+            case_description="base URI change - change folder in subschema",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message="Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
+            subject="format",
+            description="case-insensitive T and Z",
+        )(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft6 = DRAFT6.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT6.tests(),
+    DRAFT6.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT6.optional_tests_of(name="format"),
+    DRAFT6.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
+    Validator=Draft6Validator,
+    format_checker=draft6_format_checker,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        narrow_unicode_build(test)
+        or missing_format(draft6_format_checker)(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description="Recursive references between schemas",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description="Location-independent identifier",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description=(
+                "Location-independent identifier with absolute URI"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description=(
+                "Location-independent identifier with base URI change in subschema"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(),
+            subject="refRemote",
+            case_description="base URI change - change folder in subschema",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message="Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
+            subject="format",
+            description="case-insensitive T and Z",
+        )(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+TestDraft7 = DRAFT7.to_unittest_testcase(
+    DRAFT7.tests(),
+    DRAFT7.format_tests(),
+    DRAFT7.optional_tests_of(name="bignum"),
+    DRAFT7.optional_tests_of(name="content"),
+    DRAFT7.optional_tests_of(name="zeroTerminatedFloats"),
+    Validator=Draft7Validator,
+    format_checker=draft7_format_checker,
+    skip=lambda test: (
+        narrow_unicode_build(test)
+        or missing_format(draft7_format_checker)(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description="Recursive references between schemas",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description="Location-independent identifier",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description=(
+                "Location-independent identifier with absolute URI"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(371),
+            subject="ref",
+            case_description=(
+                "Location-independent identifier with base URI change in subschema"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(),
+            subject="refRemote",
+            case_description="base URI change - change folder in subschema",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message="Upstream bug in strict_rfc3339",
+            subject="date-time",
+            description="case-insensitive T and Z",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(593),
+            subject="content",
+            case_description=(
+                "validation of string-encoded content based on media type"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(593),
+            subject="content",
+            case_description="validation of binary string-encoding",
+        )(test)
+        or skip(
+            message=bug(593),
+            subject="content",
+            case_description=(
+                "validation of binary-encoded media type documents"
+            ),
+        )(test)
+    ),
+)
+
+
+with warnings.catch_warnings():
+    warnings.simplefilter("ignore", DeprecationWarning)
+
+    TestDraft3LegacyTypeCheck = DRAFT3.to_unittest_testcase(
+        # Interestingly the any part couldn't really be done w/the old API.
+        (
+            (test for test in each if test.schema != {"type": "any"})
+            for each in DRAFT3.tests_of(name="type")
+        ),
+        name="TestDraft3LegacyTypeCheck",
+        Validator=create(
+            meta_schema=Draft3Validator.META_SCHEMA,
+            validators=Draft3Validator.VALIDATORS,
+            default_types=_DEPRECATED_DEFAULT_TYPES,
+        ),
+    )
+
+    TestDraft4LegacyTypeCheck = DRAFT4.to_unittest_testcase(
+        DRAFT4.tests_of(name="type"),
+        name="TestDraft4LegacyTypeCheck",
+        Validator=create(
+            meta_schema=Draft4Validator.META_SCHEMA,
+            validators=Draft4Validator.VALIDATORS,
+            default_types=_DEPRECATED_DEFAULT_TYPES,
+        ),
+    )

venv/Lib/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_types.py

@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+"""
+Tests on the new type interface. The actual correctness of the type checking
+is handled in test_jsonschema_test_suite; these tests check that TypeChecker
+functions correctly and can facilitate extensions to type checking
+"""
+from collections import namedtuple
+from unittest import TestCase
+
+from jsonschema import ValidationError, _validators
+from jsonschema._types import TypeChecker
+from jsonschema.exceptions import UndefinedTypeCheck
+from jsonschema.validators import Draft4Validator, extend
+
+
+def equals_2(checker, instance):
+    return instance == 2
+
+
+def is_namedtuple(instance):
+    return isinstance(instance, tuple) and getattr(instance, "_fields", None)
+
+
+def is_object_or_named_tuple(checker, instance):
+    if Draft4Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.is_type(instance, "object"):
+        return True
+    return is_namedtuple(instance)
+
+
+def coerce_named_tuple(fn):
+    def coerced(validator, value, instance, schema):
+        if is_namedtuple(instance):
+            instance = instance._asdict()
+        return fn(validator, value, instance, schema)
+    return coerced
+
+
+required = coerce_named_tuple(_validators.required)
+properties = coerce_named_tuple(_validators.properties)
+
+
+class TestTypeChecker(TestCase):
+    def test_is_type(self):
+        checker = TypeChecker({"two": equals_2})
+        self.assertEqual(
+            (
+                checker.is_type(instance=2, type="two"),
+                checker.is_type(instance="bar", type="two"),
+            ),
+            (True, False),
+        )
+
+    def test_is_unknown_type(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(UndefinedTypeCheck) as context:
+            TypeChecker().is_type(4, "foobar")
+        self.assertIn("foobar", str(context.exception))
+
+    def test_checks_can_be_added_at_init(self):
+        checker = TypeChecker({"two": equals_2})
+        self.assertEqual(checker, TypeChecker().redefine("two", equals_2))
+
+    def test_redefine_existing_type(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker().redefine("two", object()).redefine("two", equals_2),
+            TypeChecker().redefine("two", equals_2),
+        )
+
+    def test_remove(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker({"two": equals_2}).remove("two"),
+            TypeChecker(),
+        )
+
+    def test_remove_unknown_type(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(UndefinedTypeCheck) as context:
+            TypeChecker().remove("foobar")
+        self.assertIn("foobar", str(context.exception))
+
+    def test_redefine_many(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker().redefine_many({"foo": int, "bar": str}),
+            TypeChecker().redefine("foo", int).redefine("bar", str),
+        )
+
+    def test_remove_multiple(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            TypeChecker({"foo": int, "bar": str}).remove("foo", "bar"),
+            TypeChecker(),
+        )
+
+    def test_type_check_can_raise_key_error(self):
+        """
+        Make sure no one writes:
+
+            try:
+                self._type_checkers[type](...)
+            except KeyError:
+
+        ignoring the fact that the function itself can raise that.
+        """
+
+        error = KeyError("Stuff")
+
+        def raises_keyerror(checker, instance):
+            raise error
+
+        with self.assertRaises(KeyError) as context:
+            TypeChecker({"foo": raises_keyerror}).is_type(4, "foo")
+
+        self.assertIs(context.exception, error)
+
+
+class TestCustomTypes(TestCase):
+    def test_simple_type_can_be_extended(self):
+        def int_or_str_int(checker, instance):
+            if not isinstance(instance, (int, str)):
+                return False
+            try:
+                int(instance)
+            except ValueError:
+                return False
+            return True
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(
+            Draft4Validator,
+            type_checker=Draft4Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+                "integer", int_or_str_int,
+            ),
+        )
+        validator = CustomValidator({"type": "integer"})
+
+        validator.validate(4)
+        validator.validate("4")
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate(4.4)
+
+    def test_object_can_be_extended(self):
+        schema = {"type": "object"}
+
+        Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
+
+        type_checker = Draft4Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+            u"object", is_object_or_named_tuple,
+        )
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(Draft4Validator, type_checker=type_checker)
+        validator = CustomValidator(schema)
+
+        validator.validate(Point(x=4, y=5))
+
+    def test_object_extensions_require_custom_validators(self):
+        schema = {"type": "object", "required": ["x"]}
+
+        type_checker = Draft4Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+            u"object", is_object_or_named_tuple,
+        )
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(Draft4Validator, type_checker=type_checker)
+        validator = CustomValidator(schema)
+
+        Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
+        # Cannot handle required
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate(Point(x=4, y=5))
+
+    def test_object_extensions_can_handle_custom_validators(self):
+        schema = {
+            "type": "object",
+            "required": ["x"],
+            "properties": {"x": {"type": "integer"}},
+        }
+
+        type_checker = Draft4Validator.TYPE_CHECKER.redefine(
+            u"object", is_object_or_named_tuple,
+        )
+
+        CustomValidator = extend(
+            Draft4Validator,
+            type_checker=type_checker,
+            validators={"required": required, "properties": properties},
+        )
+
+        validator = CustomValidator(schema)
+
+        Point = namedtuple("Point", ["x", "y"])
+        # Can now process required and properties
+        validator.validate(Point(x=4, y=5))
+
+        with self.assertRaises(ValidationError):
+            validator.validate(Point(x="not an integer", y=5))